Sunday, March 13, 2022

Franken 2024

VOGUE copyright Conde Nast

© 2022 h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com

© 2022 KM Fikes

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from KM Fikes is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to KM Fikes & h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.  No excerpt or link may be used for monetary compensation.


One shares with ye an amusing as remotely advantageous exercise in reverse psychology: a proven effective strategy, equally on toddlers and/or 'freedom-loving' Mericans.  Let us set absurdist ingenuity into motion with a call to Al Franken for President in 2024.  Deploying the following proposed wisest of ruse - he might win.

Mericans are obsessed with certain tired tropes, endeared to the kid who tilts windmills, whilst escaping serious contemplation of the technology to save energy.  The only pastime some deem more enjoyable than dragging a celebrity thru the mud, is hosing em down to note how the mud bath now makes their skin glow.  Rehabilitation is generally welcome.  Re-entry to boot.  As long as the person is not of color, having served prison time for the crime of Mary Jane procurement - which is now, not only legal, yet spurs a new 'green' economy.  After release, they are ironically disenfranchised because returning to society - as a responsible citizen - inexplicably excludes the vote.  But certain othas?  When priv peops rise from the ashes, scars of scandal sinking back into thicker skin, if their reemergence strikes 'us' as contrite enuf a posture, Mericans are inclined to give those kind a minute - not so much with the generosity of a second chance - but a brief window to entertain us with their efforts.  Emphasis on entertainment.  It had better be fun.  

That's just the voter.  Gets better.

Political operatives lean into a bent that aids our purpose here.  Rare is the communal layer of residue that is the regret upon Franken's resignation.  Behind closed doors and even some with blurred signage on their front lawn?  Most admit the error they made with Al.  They manage to proceed in that unique hushed tone of atoned humility.  Few refute that the Dems lost one that they need today - minus the due process that they are sworn to uphold.  With interior décor of an indelible chessboard, Franken's colleagues were pawns.  Haunted by punting for Bill Clinton, confessional shrugs cannot rectify their oops of ill-placed piety.  Oh, but sum'in can: a Franken Presidential run is the ideal remedy.  Daresay?  As flawless 'a fix' as occurs by bluest moons.

And pangs.

This progressive poet having to turn to the Dems is an act registering as worse than defeat.  It seems the greater crime of a lack of imagination. Yet, please, bear with one.  For there may indeed be a creative wrinkle within this un-'woke' stroke of reverse psychology.

Dems, dammit.  The party who should no longer exploit donkeys and choose a mascot more aligned with their conscience: a jellyfish.  Yet that insults jellyfish, who unlike Dems, never extracted their own spine.  Because jellyfish never had a backbone to remove.  Such could be evolutionary, however - as may apply, also - to any political party.

If under-the-sea symbols serve, one happens to be of the 'pearl' ilk: a speck of grain irritating the structural lining whilst becoming one's own jewel.  One dreams of the absurd bubble bursting upon a two-party system that purchased 'the leading' nation.  Each behemoths now, with their own television network as blowhole.  Either is insufferable while inevitably, one holds one's nose, retching back vomit, to vote as a disgruntled default Dem.  The sole dignity remains in one's vacuous title of 'Independent'.  One cheers for The Squid Squad on most matters.  Liz and/or Bernie too.  One remains perplexed, however, as to why the spine of our lovable looney lefties hasn't stacked flesh, bone, and nerve to comprise a digit with knuckle and nail that raises its middle self at the Dems by forming a party reflective of the Dem-repellant Reformation. 

We just don't have that time tho'.  

Biden is...Joe.  Harris?  Black and South Asian.  And not a man.  And we?  As evidenced by school-board-meeting attendance with lit torches and librarians in fetal positions under their desks, we, my gentlesoulfolk, find ourselves smack in the midst of The Backlash.  Any Wonder that its songs are in the key of misogynoir*?  If youth can no longer read Nobel Laureate, the late Toni Morrison, and the conceptualist/curator of the Pulitzer-Prized 1619 Project, Nikole Hannah-Jones, has 'that' much trouble with academic tenure?  How the bleep can Kamala office it Oval?  Next week, Supreme Court nominee, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, will weather her confirmation Inquisition - where GOP dog whistles are apt to turn a marbled hall into a poop-strewn park.  In her second Georgia gubernatorial run, Stacey Abrams' cameo proves that she has learned the drill.  As is custom in every execution of black ‘excellence’, Star Trek casts black women before any planetary constituency.  Her children's book may be banned but Abrams' scripted role as POTUS 'POUE, President Of United Earth', will - streaming for Paramount Plus - "boldly go" forth.

Welcome to The Backlash.  A reverse.  Seeking psychology.  Unless?  We be crafty.  Let us, counterclockwise, dip ladle and stir cauldron.

Think about Nancy.  Pelosi has a vital role in our scheme of schemes.  Yep, Al will 'seem' to present Nancy Pelosi, and other Dem establishment, with a bit of a pickle.  They cannot publicly support a choice this common sensical.  That very twisting will delight detractors.  Get it now?  This is the whole idea.  If the other side thinks Al makes Nancy squirm?  He's in.  Let them cry 'hypocrite' until they go hoarse, turning their MAGA hats to the back.  

The core of their alter-ethos is the given allowance to thumb their noses.  Thus Al will be their guy.

Then there's Thumbelina Trumpalooza.  Still.  Further proof that entertaining Mericans supersedes leading them/us.  Nixon likely won that debate with Kennedy but Dick sweated too much on camera.  Reagan budget-cut his teeth in Hollywood.  And there was this show on NBC called The Apprentice.  Before that?  Love Boat's 'Gopher' represented Iowa in the House for some stretch.  A Californian recall feels practically quaint that could elect a Terminator.  All Republicans.  'Official' theatrical chops of Democrats have yet to be put to the test so stealthily.  Franken's bona fides bury all of the above.  How many politicians plummet, not even hosting SNL, but attempting the opening skit?  Franken was a lauded SNL writer, for years, who served in the US Senate, for years - absent incident.  Until there was one.  At the absolute inopportune juncture.

One was stumped by those who voted for Trump.  Twice.  And Obama.  Twice.  I repeat: there were/are Mericans with the spellbinding record of voting twice for both.  One's dizzy spell broke once one could accept that some voters have not developed political conviction.  They subscribe to no ideology, hence inhabiting a nebulous purpose, conveniently at the whim of interests oft deceptively against them.  Which is the intended protocol although they pride themselves on being Palinian 'mavericks'.  That is exactly how the system has designed itself to function - under the auspices of a rebellious 'liberty' that is basically reproducing repression.  Theirs.  Capitalists are supposed to obliviously consume.  Ad nauseam with lil' rhyme nor reason.  A more advanced ethic would disrupt Da Colonial Project.  Keep believing the bull and buying bull's merch.  

- White Republican women voted for Trump.  

- White Democrat women would not support Kirsten Gillibrand, citing her cancellation of           Franken. 

- Bernie Bros won't even realize why they are drawn to rally round Franken.  

We can likely count on the valuable innumerable with no trust in pollsters.  Because they think they are him.  They are not.  No more Franken than they are Trump.  Even bombing at an open mic, many manage to continue overestimating their own humor.  Let us, then, not disturb their illusion that they can take to small club stages or local polls.  A humor miscalculation is accompanied by their 'her' concerns.  Inevitably, they have dissed women yet these offenses were/are too quotidian for them to recognize and too numbing for those afflicted to mention.  

Franken was once their worst nightmare: he got caught - empty-handed - and lost his job for far less than they have done or said.  But now?  He's back, baby!  And running for the tit tip-top job.  Franken, thereby, morphs into their fantasy.  They'll support him like bra pushing up boob.  Some won't even know Franken at all - not his past nor his present.  But they will take note of how his candidacy makes white feminists apoplectic and black women roll their eyes.  That reaction is more than enough to garner their favor.  For the record?  Thy blogger is black, female, doesn't roll her eyes nor neck, and only snaps her fingers - whilst sporting shades indoors - as retro applause during poetry readings.  However, one will commit to the practice elsewhere, throughout a Franken run, and impressively feign shock when caught on film doing so.  As a patriot, one will revert to stereotype to stand snap to the (wink, wink) mission.  

FOX NEWS 'man-on-the-street':

"Franken? Nah, I don't know what he stands for.  But he's a good guy who the chicks just don't get.  C'mon already, give the dude a chance to go back to Washington.  Pretty funny too.  'We' could 'all' use a laugh. So why not, Al?  'We've' 'all' said 'our' share of crap.  Doesn't mean 'we're' not good at 'our' 'job'.  #Me Too ruined the good ones - like Tony Robbins said, until the feminists made him apologize.  They've gone too far.  Bringing back Al?  Shows who's boss."

MSNBC 'man-on-the-street':

"Franken?  He was a decent Senator...apparently.  I liked watching him grill a guy.  And the jokes too.  What he did can't be defended.  What, uh, was it, by the way?  Whatever was so bad, he's no Jeffrey Epstein.  I get why some women don't like him running when there hasn't been a woman President yet.  They're right to be pissed.  But he's a comedian.  And a Jew.  Like Zelensky.  He's the 'West's' hero now.  Ya know...maybe that's the trend. 'We' did the black thing - which made us wind up with Trump.  Don't get me wrong.  It was good to try that.  But 'historic' doesn't make 'everyone' happy.  With Franken?  Hey, at least 'the room' will laugh."

Both of these men - on behalf of 'the whole' - will vote.  For Franken.

Almost too easy.  Da Great Reversal needs no rehearsal.  Some U-turns are illegal.  We chance the screech anyway.  Why?  To get where we need to go when time is of the essence.

Eve of spring, 2022.  The midterms loom...in sure doom.  Our maps are gerrymandered to the (fish) gills.  Climate refugees rival those of conflict.  Totalitarianism tends to view sovereign nations as its eventual cruise ship buffet.  Eh, estimation.  'Over' for rugged individual humor.  'Under' for international appetite.  The horror in Palestine, Somalia, LibyaYemen Ukraine is matched by its honor - whilst its resistance is mute to the isolated ravenous.  For Vlad, Ukraine may, most respectfully, only be breakfast.  If so?  Who is dinner?  At world peril, do not forget dessert.  Or borders.  Where African students are forcibly delayed on the edge of noble Ukraine.  Please, dear reader, mistake not one's use of "noble" as facetious.  If not for the volatile urgency of exodus, their tactics nigh qualify as tepid.  Ukraine, by kind comparison, is old school in denying a bus seat.  C'mon, been there, done that, still got the boycott 'T': generational Trauma.  Other borders up their ante in Lashin' Back: from horseback, whipping Haitians whilst those same borders cage Columbians fleeing made-in-Merica cartels.  To quote VP Harris - born in Oakland to a father immigrating from Jamaica and a mother immigrating from India: "Don't come."  Meantime?  South Korea just elected a she-averse conservative that North Korea will undoubtedly 'test'.  Cash is increasingly crypto (what the...) and COVID variants ain't hardly over.  Neither is Trump's stranglehold.  Roe (gulp) probably is.  

An absurdist experiment - in the guise of a mental reversal - is no abandonment of 'the cause'.  To be clear, Franken is no 'white savior' slip.  The alleged choice - in appearance, reluctant as ridiculous - could be a clever 'representation' flip.  This counterintuitive exercise buys us time - four to eight years - to wait out The Backlash.  How else to face the hell stench-ed cataclysm in which we find our electoral health hanging by a burning thread?  To woefully misquote MLK:

The arc of the moral universe...bends...so much that it boomerangs all over the joint.” **

We are past due to get realistic about our survival.  That 'our' is the priv populous; the marginalized sect never takes for granted the miracle that is our endurance in spite of rule derelict in humanity.  If this is Empire's final lap?  Franken's controversial lip?  Al's got jokes.  Maybe Rome was hedonistic - which can have its charms, when uncontested consent propels mutual pleasure.  Rome's Fall, nevadaless, with lore titillating, lacked equity and hilarity.

Unjustly, this surreal attempt - psychologically reversed - may not redeem Franken's reputation.  Except for some solace in priv's penalty: a US Presidency.  Franken, bright as issue-engaged, correctly calls the late Paul Wellstone his predecessor.  On friendship and mentorship that legit, we can only pause.  Peep Al's podcast - which is not hosted by a fellow who is even contemplating a run.  Too, well, thoughtful in the targeted 'critical' sense, hence dangerously 'frank', set free to be nuanced in that manner avoided by most elected officials.  Further, much of his policies were not far off the 'Dem' mark - whatever and wherever that mark may supposedly be these dire days.  Issue-engagement is complicated by relativity - in the direct presence, distant suggestion, or complex complicity to a hostile atmosphere that is sexual harassment.  One has no idea what personal psychic work followed his defrocking.  One assumes, nonetheless, that he possesses a conscience with which the psychiatric community actually grappled to identify in 2016's Presidential victor.  What one recalls the most is how one actually cannot recall if Franken's bow was more shame-faced swift or resolutely gracious.  Franken was the anti-Cuomo, used to exiting stage left for SNL costume changes in seconds.  Alas, this ain't about Al.  Elections rarely are.  We vote for or against our projections onto candidates.  

Comedians manage to remain a culture's truth-tellers.  Ruefully so when they are transphobic, or just cruel, or both.  Even commodified, our exchange is somehow more honest than that transaction where a poll tax was supposed to be repealed.  Plutocrats fancy themselves as 'court' yet their crowns - crooked - compare not to the heckling tomatoes of the hoi polloi.  Charlatans to harlequins, only the elite touch crown jewels.  Conversely, tomatoes, gone bad, are composted - as adept at yielding to human squeeze as worm crawl.  Shakespeare, with royal benefactors, relied on this power impalance, habitually saving his best lines for the jester.  Da Bard deployed Elizabethan reverse psychology wherein the crown clown delivers.  Never in the position to drop entrenched systems, they twirl a mock scepter with alerting bells, before tossing it.  To then juggle - in a distracting majesty - those otherwise mundane balls of Status Quo.  Albeit satirized down to size, 'order' is kept up in air.  

In addition to an astute as affable podcast, engaging with sophisticated thinkers, Al Franken is presently back on tour.  Each audience is a crucial laboratory.  The shrewdest succeed in the comedy profession by mastering the skill set of reading the zeitgeist - with scepter skewering those consensus of comfort in which 'we' foolishly rest.  The mood remains in flux and the best stay one step ahead of the next subliminal trend in societal expression of 'our' existential angst.  The sole predictability?  Always tragic.  Lone recourse?  Laughter's reprieve.  Thanks to Putin's latest stunt, 'strongmen' will soon be outta style; the everyman will once again be desirable. 

The Reckoning was/is required.  Its premier mistake was its tardiness.  Or rather, 'attention', since Tarana Burke had long been on the case.  Calm.  The force of appropriated fury, shaking in a concealed coddled bottle, could only release past full throttle.  Last line of Langston's REM poem warned ya'll about 'deferment'.  Early on, The Reckoning's hot dam(n) broke.  Too priv-ed to parse, she swallowed - in her 'wake' - Franken's right to defense.  One cares not to google the percentage of lightning striking twice.  Yet?  Might 'our' fateful 'current' 'wash' a white ass ashore, buoyed by Blacklash, unwittingly proving to be the forthright but-t in one of 'our' most fickle moments?

Image Credit: Al Franken as 'Stuart Smalley' on NBC's SNL


With two years left - given the fraught state of our frayed union - it's Al, ya'll.  From the Back.  Lash.  Franken, and his obligatory pale member, are charged with pleasing a fragile demos, keeping a patriarchy, innately perverse, in orgasmic stitches - raucously loud enough to ignore the quiet potential of substantive legislation. 

In his own words - to his own mirror:

                                  "...good enough, smart enough, and doggonit, people..."                                                                                       (might just) "...like..." (voting for) "...you." 


* "misogynoir" coined by Dr. Moya Bailey 

Stevie Wonder's arguable opus album, Songs in the Key of Life 

** "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice.” Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.


a clever as compassionate critique 
on the implausibility 
of POSTness


Til our next 'post', feast upon produce in season...

© 2022 KM Fikes 
© 2022 h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com 

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from KM Fikes is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to KM Fikes & h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.  No excerpt or link may be used for monetary compensation. 

Wednesday, January 19, 2022

Penultimate Confession

VOGUE copyright Conde Nast

© 2022 h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com

© 2022 KM Fikes

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from KM Fikes is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to KM Fikes & h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.  No excerpt or link may be used for monetary compensation.

© Aimin Tang

pe·nul·ti·mate 
/pəˈnəltəmət/ adj. "second to last in a series"
Oxford Dictionary

The sky is not falling. Yet.  Sea levels are rising.  Yes.  Stardust, we be.  Ashes to dust - stargazin'.  Gentlesoulfolk, we find ourselves 'starring' in a cliff-hung episode before the finale.  The fissures further split, though slow, beneath 'Empire' - as its cracks of unconscionable exploits continue to squint, wince, and cower.  At daylight.

There is a happening.  Right now.  Some goose-bumpin' action - all about us.  A gift, perhaps of epic proportion, to invigorate the weary social justice agent.  We have before us sum'in upon which all of institutional jurisprudence is built.  We have - in our grasp - that which domestic violence and generational trauma and state-sanctioned atrocity, and the very ilk of most ills - from time immemorial - rely, to so much as gleam the potential within the possibility for reconciliation.  If not even reparations.

We have...our wish come true.  We have 'their' penultimate confession.  No, it ain't the-of-the 'final word', propelling us forth into the sphere of healing that only Afrofuturist science fiction fantasy imagines.  But dammit, my good peops, how it counts!  It is the pride before the fall, the pause before the epiphany, that moment of toes poised for the quantum leap from black grey matter-ed synapse to common sensical revelation.  'They' have confessed.  At last.

And they have done so on a loop de loop that would be a wet dream for litigation.  Everywhere it can be notated.  For the record.  Presently, they are most revealing at school board meetings, unburdening their souls, practically upon bended knees:

"We don't want our children to feel bad about their whiteness."

"We don't want white children to feel guilty."

guilt 
/ɡilt/ noun "the fact of having committed a specified or implied offense or crime"
Oxford Dictionary

Many of them utter - in the same breath, mind you:

"My ancestors came thru Ellis Island.  What does slavery have to do with me?"

"That was a different time." 

"I can't be held responsible for what some great-grandfather did whom I never met."

"Maybe there is 'some' racism left.  But that's not me.  
Ask my black neighbor, What's-His-Name."

"Some people just need to make everything about race. 
Since they keep bringing it up?  Maybe they're the racist ones."

All of the above implies absolution from guilt.  Doth it not?  

One will not insult the astute reader (for indeed ye must be to bear with this lil' ditty) by mentioning the fallacy of a distraction that has become the phantom row about 'critical race theory' - that is actually not taught to Junior.  Unless Junior is the rarest of prodigies, pursuing his law degree as a pre-adolescent.

How hath this miraculous confessional comet graced our non-falling skies!?  For...oh...for the only way that one's child is at risk for this alleged "guilt" - which others might actually consider an invaluable portal to empathy-infused civic responsibility, if said child is entrusted to access more humanity than the hypoCRITICAL parent - is if...c'mon...if racism...is quite the power.  In and to a shared culture.  And it is a horror.  And it is a terror.  And a most gross injustice.  Inducing guilt.  Is this not an unADULTerated admittance, daresay, crystalline confession?  Enuf to make 'em fear that verifiable history morphs into this boogey-man called a racist that does not hide behind pointed hood yet actually resides within, causing a crisis in the self-esteem development of the next generation, absurdly privileged enuf to succeed upon and because of ignorance from hardest fact. 

Thank you.  Eva so.  Albeit absent any glimmer of contrition, your paranoia about truth is the most glorious of exposes.  Why and how can Junior "feel bad" about the past unless you are finally fully acknowledging that it is a past so severe in shame, upending thine own notions of legacy to an origin of tragedy, that...uhm...that merely knowing it may wreck the world into which you are raising him to believe that he is entitled to construct his confidence upon this reverberating sin of kin.  Again, thank you.

Let us give praise: your penultimate confession is a start - to setting us all free.


a clever as compassionate critique 
on the implausibility 
of POSTness


Til our next 'post', feast upon produce in season...

© 2022 KM Fikes 
© 2022 h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com 

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from KM Fikes is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to KM Fikes & h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.  No excerpt or link may be used for monetary compensation. 

Monday, November 1, 2021

Día de los Muertos

 VOGUE copyright Conde Nast

© 2021 h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com

© 2021 KM Fikes

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from KM Fikes is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to KM Fikes & h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.  No excerpt or link may be used for monetary compensation.


With our dear pops passing in late September, 2017, the initial anniversary that following fall of 2018, welcomed a broader map down avenues of acknowledgement.  Sumthin to collective consciousness that made Día de los Muertos resonate, resulting in thy blogger's former porch display.  One avoided an alter, marigold garland, facial adornment, or other rites of reverence - for all seem earned only by a lineage three thousand years deep.  Allusion, then, felt more fitting than any aspect overt.  Outta respect for a culture not one's own, I chose a nineteenth century guide.  

0 copy.jpeg
© 2018 KM Fikes


Engaged one's share of research prior as one questioned if one's H2Omeloncholic ass wasn't 'appropriating' a sacred Mexican ritual.  Loving what I learned. José Guadalupe Posada Aguilar (1852–1913) was a lithographer and illustrator of political satirist 'ilk' before the term existed.  Coincided ideally with the Mexican Revolution.  His work has become so ubiquitous, that the reader is likely unwittingly familiar:


jose guadalupe posada "the dandies".jpg



Posada was a fellow cheeky kindred who was bravely intra-critiquing the Mexican bourgeoisie: how they would dress, midday, as a symptom of their classism.  


a75b30c2d44d6abebf02a7af415ebc6f--jose-guadalupe-guadalupe-posada.jpg

His ironic use of skeletons, as dapper relics, resonated as symbols for Día de los Muertos - whose observance dates back farther than when colonialism was but a 'twinkle' in Empire's ravaging eye.  Tragically misunderstood my missionaries, Hallow's Eve or All Saint's Day seemed the less 'evil' or lesser 'savage' alternative encouraged in the US - preferring honoring Christian saints to the deceased family members of everyday folk - as actually intended.  Highly suspicious that the elaborate marigold alters were deemed too democratic: daring the supposition that if one lived and was loved, such a shared existence earned honorable observance.  Posada's work resonates too well in the idea or perhaps, audacious inquiry, of who is worthy of ceremony.

What one digs most here is how Posada's politico-art places him as one of the first 'influencers' or 'thought leaders'.  "Day of the Dead" existed millennia preceding him.  Yet the popularity of his illustrations in leading Mexican publications created iconic imagery that not only was incorporated into Día de los Muertos festivities but seems to have become the de facto visual for its costuming today -  in reverent socio-spiritual exercise.  

Posada apparently inspired no less than artists like Diego Rivera:

Sunday Afternoon in Alameda Park, 1946-1947, Diego Rivera

La Calavera Catrina,
 
or "Elegant Skull", is perhaps Posada's most famous reference, with her intentionally ostentatious hat:

posada002-1100x790.jpg

Those closer to the holiday's pre-Columbian Mesoamerica origins forgo Posada's millinery 'commentary' to instead weave their hair directly in stunning floral displays. The choices of flower are not random.  Each color holds meaning: their wish for the flight of the deceased.  Chuckling at Posada's parody of brown peops' middle-class mores 'aspiring' to Euro ideals, literally in procession, down Mexican streets - right alongside these ancient floral intricacies of Indigenous pageantry on November 1 thru November 2.  Just gotta appreciate the translation of that nigh absurd tension: how Empire eva looms, daresay 'haunts' - even the esteemed expression of the most intimate remembrance.

Traditionally, favorite foods - of those beloved souls transcended - are offerings in edible memoriam.  My sister and I are currently roasting sweet potatoes.  Either late parents' taste buds, as well as our pre-Middle Passage ancestral 'root', is thereby well-acknowledged.  Like memory and perspective, one dish can invite diverse 'flavor'.  My sister's sensorial preference leans more savory while I prefer the sweeter culinary route.  Am quite humbled by the extreme fortune of a tree just feet away with the Fuji variety beckoning a picking.  Likely later today, I'll sauté slices of these autumnal apples - at their seasonal peak - in ghee and cinnamon, to pour into the steaming split root veggie...with flesh the color of marigolds.

Observe as ye will, my sweets...




a clever as compassionate critique 
on the implausibility 
of POSTness


Til our next 'post', feast upon produce in season...


© 2021 KM Fikes 
© 2021 h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com 

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from KM Fikes is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to KM Fikes & h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.  No excerpt or link may be used for monetary compensation.

Monday, September 27, 2021

not our first rodeo

VOGUE copyright Conde Nast
© 2021 h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com
© 2021 KM Fikes

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from KM Fikes is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to KM Fikes & h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.  No excerpt or link may be used for monetary compensation.


COMMERCIAL COPY 

HOUN: Hi there! I'm Calhoun, fourth-generation Texan and a proud board member of this Texas Tourism council. We've been deprived of our liberties - locked up for a while now in these plague times. Liberty-lovers are naturally itching to travel again.

DIRECTOR: Uh, Houn? Let's avoid words like..."liberty". Kinda partisan these days. We want  potential visitors to 'feel the warmth'. 

HOUN: Good thinking.

DIRECTOR: Maybe?  "Thinking." 

HOUN: But this here's Texas.

DIRECTOR: Yeah, but...ya don't...you don't twang. Why we chose you for official Tourism        Spokesguy. The critical-race folk would hear that accent and say it 'regionalized' you...somehow. Might maybe mark 'class' too. Stick with what they call Standard English. Keep your tonality bland and thereby throw em off our trail. We don't want to alienate Vermont.

HOUN: We don't?  But their senator is Sanders.

DIRECTOR: And their tourism dollars are Andrew Jackson. Take two...

HOUN: Hi there! I'm Calhoun, fourth-generation Texan and a proud board member of this Texas Tourism council. Texas welcomes you home. You and the whole family. 'Specially fetuses.  Not keen though on the "tired, huddled masses yearning to" seek asylum.  Like that half-Caribbean Vice Lady says, "Don't come." 

DIRECTOR: Best to leave out any mention there - that half-breed part. Could lose the whole South.

HOUN: You're a sharp one.

DIRECTOR: Take three...

HOUN: Some...will feel right at home here.  Cause in Texas?  We may make voting hard as hell but when it comes to litigation?  Our big sky's the limit!  Those Vegas 'spreads' have got nuttin on us. Dig into our Texas-size buffet...of litigation. Oh...I said "nuttin". Should we go back?

DIRECTOR: I think we'll leave it. Felt kind folksy. 'Homespun' shouldn't raise flags.  We want a balance to entice. Sounding too stuffy might defeat our purpose. I'll cut/paste. Don't start from the beginning. "Buffet..." Take four...

HOUN: Texas-size buffet...of litigation. Sue women. Sue their doctors. Sue the Lyft driver to their doctors. Sue their confidants who should have sued 'em too...

[DIRECTOR's thumbs up]

HOUN: ...Sued 'em too cause they must've known. Sue CVS cause they foil our strategy by selling those pesky pregnancy tests that might signal those women - with only pitch-perfect cycles - before six weeks. Here in Texas, you can look forward to suing til to your heart's content. You'll sue so much, you won't even notice you've been barred from voting polls. 

[DIRECTOR's smile broadens - hand motioning for more]

HOUN: For your next vacation, why go all the way to Commiefornia with their green-slushy Muslim 'fasts'?  Oops. That might put off the West Coast.

DIRECTOR: Keep that in too though. Them? We need to discourage. Between their cost of living crisis and all those fires, they're fleeing the Golden State and settling here. Bringing along their dang veganism. Could turn Texas blue or at least purple. Offend away. Take five...

HOUN: Here in the Lone Star State, we like big, meaty appetites.  Everything big. Best way to work up a Texas appetite might be what's now called voluntourism: as a vigilante on the border to assist ICE. Or consider our latest sport gaining in popularity over night: slave patrol reenactment.  We supply everything: horses, whips, but especially the free-wheeling vestiges of state-sponsored supremacy.  

[DIRECTOR sends up passionate 'okay' sign]

Getty

HOUN: Never ends here. In Texas, it's as if time just stops. We make sure to wrangle the hands of the clock. Like when we were the last state to free slaves. Since we do things are own way, they were actually freed already but we just didn't bother to let 'em know. That covers your Juneteenth history - now a more mainstream holiday. Texas is a living museum - good for the kids that way. What goes better with holidays than hospitality? Texas can't wait to show you ours.

DIRECTOR: That's a whip wrap.


a clever as compassionate critique 
on the implausibility 
of POSTness


Til our next 'post', feast upon produce in season...


© 2021 KM Fikes 
© 2021 h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com 

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from KM Fikes is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to KM Fikes & h2omeloncholy@blogspot.com with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.  No excerpt or link may be used for monetary compensation.


Monday, September 6, 2021

Green-Eyed Mainstream

Languaging matters. So. And yet? One - too oft - involuntarily eavesdrops upon a certain phrasing that practically drips off the mainstream tongue:

“He’s so talented; don’t ya just hate him?”

“She has style to spare; we’re so jealous.”

Unfortunately, such alleged ‘compliments’ are generally gender-coded. Attributes outside gender norms are not generally acknowledged, let alone affirmed. One struggles to recall the last time one heard:

“Damn, he sure can knit; don’t we hate his guts?” Grateful for the rarity here. Not quite sure what offense his entrails could commit - between purl one, knit two - to warrant so severe a curse. But hey.

“My Begonia Sweet Pea-s don’t bloom like his; makes ya pea-green with envy, huh?” Once associated with jealousy, a flavor is off. Nonetheless, one’s enjoyment of peas, especially split in soup, is unaffected.

This warped acquiescence to “hate”, within a shut-down shout-out, can be troubling enough. Further, this particular framing - all too common - implicates the listener, sans their permission, in the realm defined as the opposite of ‘love’. “Don’t you hate too?” The speaker assumes that the listener must. Only? Neither social agent hates in this context. Both are not in the grips of something but rather, the grace of it. Admiration.

If one might dare be so brazen as to attempt unpacking the unconscious: “I admire…” is what we actually mean. Is it not? What is admiration if not an admittance that we can be inspired by one another? To admire is to accept the unsolicited offering of being moved, daresay, taken higher. By another. ‘Inspired’ is centered ‘in’ the word, ‘spirit’ - for however that might, respectively, settle with the dear reader’s existential drift. We are all - at every, single moment, without fail - no more nor less than examples for one another. We are three signs interchangeably:

  1. what/how to be
  2. what/how not to be
  3. what/how/when to neutrally observe.

That’s it, really. Why complicate our greatest access to guidance - each other - with this inexplicable refrain? Why pervert inspiration? Our strengths - and execution of those strengths into accomplishments - are gifts that we share. Lights directing. Our weaknesses - and consequences of those weaknesses - are gifts of no less value. Blinking lights warning. Why do we not insist upon languaging that honors this invaluable social transaction? How is jealousy - even in jest - an accolade? For whatever else may fall woefully short of commendation, envy will still trump it.

We need not even look to some austere metaphor for life’s abundance. Las Vegas - where what happens stays - will do. Is life not an infinite Vegas buffet, with the promise to ever replenish opportunity for opportunities? Another’s seeming luck, aspirational trait, or ‘allure’ that draws an aware/evolved camaraderie, et cetera, is not the last sloppy, sinful square of tiramisu at the end of the dessert bar. And hell, what if it is? No amount of awareness that another may possess or evolution that another may traverse- within themselves or in relation - can compare to what we endeavor to attain on our own, in order to solidify the individuality of our original narratives. Infinite, baby! As for the finite? After all, tiramisu, tarte tatin, Waldorf salad, (With candied walnuts, never raw/ never roasted. Waldorf walnuts must be candied. Any home dinner party or paying establishment that does not candy their walnuts in their Waldorf? Well, we hate that, don’t we? Note: one indicts the act, not actor. ’Tis their piteous culinary ineptitude at fault, not them. Plus there ain’t nuttin to emulate here. C’mon, now.) Where were we in our enlightenment exercise? Tiramisu, tarte tatin, Waldorf salad and a multitude of edible ecstasies, upon which one is confident the dear reader can ruminate at will, are all concoctions originally derived from scant leftovers. Ironically enough. Ladyfinger biscuits turned to doorstops? Soak em. Soak em in what? That day-old expresso about to be tossed. Save the cheerleader; save the world? Nah, brah. Since the dawn of time, one thing, and one thing alone, has saved civilizations and planets yet discovered: mascarpone. And charitable speech.

Layer.

Chill.

Serve.

Orgasm.

One can always choose the latter, a crooked high-five, that speaks low, mouthing the heat of hate. It seethes in some corner. And corners are the only legal jurisdiction where seething is allowed. Contrarily, one’s viewpoint can be so much more vast. Free from limiting lingo, we can fully participate as our own inner Patrick Swayze-s, refusing to corner the rhythm of kindness. Aghast to find the best of ourselves anywhere but staged central, we can take our own words by the hand. We can lead our verbiage, train all summer, and try running and leaping - all to catch our ‘baby’ selves at that pivotal moment called ‘rising to the occasion’. Moreover, we can do so being ourselves, taking just who we are and what we have before us - tired biscuits and stale coffee. Granted, the flic musta edited out a tiramisu scene so pray your pardon for any metaphor cross-pollination. The issue, however, remains punctuated. Literally. Italian to English translation of tir·a·mi·su or tirəmēˈso͞o,-ˈmēso͞o/ : “lift me up”.

Would it be that food porn proves the most exploitative of envy but other sensory arousal-s make taste indulgences democratic. Take a certain sartorial appetite. Empty calories just as easily satisfy when balancing on an avante-garde exaggerated square toe. From Milan to London and Paris to New York, we have yet to be introduced to the shoe or bag, dubiously capturing the aesthetic mood ‘of’ that season…not to “covet”. If ever there be a singular descriptor in runway reviews. Less popular is ‘compulsively consume’ or ‘desperately consign’. Perhaps consumption and consignment are too normalized to titillate. Any guilt/shame there seems socially acceptable enough yet somehow above that communal acceptance of closet habits, is an expectation deemed ‘natural’, if not some form of reptilian default. To covet.

What — of purpose — are we promoting thru indulgence of spite and/or envy instead of inviting spoken ingenuity which prioritizes compassion? Can we imagine that utterance into being - statement as a landscape, ‘pea-green with empathy’? Then again? Known color need not apply for ‘utter’ beauty might defy any identifiable shade. Albeit one cannot confirm, one suspects that our coveting mode of conversation only diminishes the full spectrum of inspiration that one might be fortunate to receive. If such be so, why inhibit another’s capacity to lift our own potential? These are uncut gems in the cauldron at the rainbow’s end - precious nuggets angling glimpses, not glares, at human excellence. Languaging patterns permeate our atmosphere as if we are stirring up, salad tossing, conjuring, syllable by syllable, weaving spells throughout the coven that is our culture. Ours. We create it. Is our collective preference for raw digs at some comedic roast?

Candied, thank you. Please.

In our e-saturated society, why do we allow our spoken word - our bond - to sour the sweeter intention? Is the confinement of spite or envy preferred to the wonders of altruistic engagement? Brené Brown, PhD, is a pioneer in the academic study of vulnerability. Vulnerability may be associated with emotional risk at too much cost. What would we be risking, though, by messaging minus that tug at black kinks or red pigtail? Are we so uncomfortable with our micro crushes on one another’s earned skill or seemingly innate trait, that on the verbal playground, confused by the butterflies in our belly, we tug hair and run? Could just be gas from experimenting with expired mascarpone.

When one performs this most complicated task - that is existence - with a modicum of aplomb, should we not demand a vocabulary far more worthy? Our feats merit sonnets, not disses of spurned lovers or comic-book archenemies. Let us delight in the rare delicacies at our one, planetary table. Oddly, when eloquence is most required, one rehearses their words, writing multiple drafts, seeking counsel from poets and playwrights. But then? It is not unusual during the esteemed presentation of an award or intimacy of a wedding toast, for the speaker, in black tie, to read their meticulously selected homage: “how jealous” they are personally or “how much we all hate” the honoree. Prestigious aesthetics beguile yet the elegance of an affair may be best captured in how we articulate. What if we resolve to retire the back-handed for open palms? Like tarte tatin, we can ‘flip’ this, ya’ll.

What might shift in choosing the vulnerability of validation for what we, indeed, love? Options as ooey as gooey await - caramelized in praise untainted. May one suggest consideration of phrasing with a certain savior faire? Am usually ardently opposed to dissemination of unsolicited advise but since one does not know what savior faire means, this tip counts not. Just sounds more graceful. Bet one with savior faire says something elevated to the effect:

“Sure wish I could…[fill in impressed verb]…like her; she’s badass.”

The positive nod should include some form of soft profanity because even the elevated need not compromise the naughty.